Explore the policy map in 3D. Drag to rotate, choose Pan to move the chart, and scroll or pinch to zoom. Select a marker for the assessment and source articles.
100%
Drag to rotate · two fingers to pan and pinch · Shift-drag or right-drag to pan. Keyboard: arrows follow the selected mode; Shift + arrows pan; + / − zoom; T gives top view; Home resets.
Loading the interactive 3D chart… Every assessment is available below.
LIBERTARIANLIBERALCONSERVATIVEAUTHORITARIANCENTRISTPersonal freedom ↖Economic freedom ↗EVIDENCE NEEDED · NO POLITICAL POSITION ASSIGNED
Gold points have evidence on both axes. Grey points sit in a separate evidence-needed area. Lines connect spaced markers to their actual scores; spacing has no political meaning. Every marker has the same height: depth is presentation only, with no third political axis. Top view makes the two-axis positions easier to compare. Scores describe the published record, not a complete political philosophy.
The cited evidence covers 2 policy areas. Indicators of less state control: federal protection for abortion access; limits on immigration detention and protection of lawful status. Each area has equal weight; repeated mentions do not increase its weight. Uncovered areas widen the uncertainty range. This is a limited policy sample from the series and reviewed primary records, not a complete policy rating.
Named sponsor or cosponsor of S. 2150, the Women’s Health Protection Act, protecting access to abortion services. Primary record · 2025-06-24 ↗
The cited evidence covers 1 policy area. Indicators of more state control: single-payer public health coverage; expanded public financing of health coverage. Each area has equal weight; repeated mentions do not increase its weight. Uncovered areas widen the uncertainty range. This is a limited policy sample from the series and reviewed primary records, not a complete policy rating.
Named sponsor or cosponsor of the 2025 Medicare for All proposal, replacing the current insurance structure with universal public coverage. Primary record · 2025-04-29 ↗
Higher scores indicate less state control over speech, privacy, personal choices, due process, peaceful movement and civilian firearm ownership.
Economic freedom ↗
Higher scores indicate less state control over enterprise, trade, taxation, property and the provision of goods and services.
Evidence, with limits
Estimates combine attributable statements in this series with reviewed primary records, including specific bill sponsorships. Each covered policy area votes +1 for less state control, −1 for more, or 0 for conflicting evidence. The score is 50 plus 35 times the mean, rounded to five points. Uncovered axes remain unscored; no party defaults are used.
Updated with the series
New people and articles enter the same live roster used by the filters. Article indicators recalculate on each visit. Primary-source additions were reviewed September 22, 2026; their dated policy actions remain visible in the evidence. New profiles need a full name in the series headline; later articles with an unambiguous surname join the same collection. Current roles require separate verification.
These are interpretive estimates, not candidate-completed quiz results or measurements of a whole political philosophy. Matched passages, primary-source summaries and coverage confidence accompany each person. Ranges show how unexamined policy areas could change the estimate; they are sensitivity bounds, not statistical confidence intervals. A regional label is a chart location, not an identity or endorsement. Every person has a unique display position, with leader lines for overlapping scores. A grey marker in the evidence-needed area does not assign an ideology. Phrase matching can miss nuance; low confidence means fewer than three matched policy areas, and medium means three or more. Comparison articles stay linked to everyone featured; their shared policy lists are excluded from automated scoring. The chart uses no party-based scores. The Nolan model’s freedom axes reflect a particular way of comparing politics. About the Nolan-chart model ↗